Website rebuild

As some of you are aware we have been having problems with the website, and before it actually broke, we decided we needed to rebuild it urgently. We knew that this was something that we would have to do ourselves, as  we simply didn’t have the necessary funding to pay for it. There wasn’t time to find sponsorship for this either.

Neither Rea nor I are really experts in this field, but luckily we found Tracey Rickard, (WordPress custom theme, design and website development),  via another contact,  and she kindly came to our rescue.  Unbelievably she has given a large chunk of her time to us for free, for which we are extremely grateful. She  successfully performed the upgrade for us, and we are particularly glad that we involved her as it  turned out to be a lot trickier than envisaged.  She subsequently helped with some of the styling as well.  We would certainly have struggled without her.

Apart from the visual appearance, you will notice some changes:  all information is now available to everyone. We have abandoned the members area, now that we have the Discussion Forum up and running.  (Separate registration required)

Please be reassured that you are all still safely registered on our database.    The registration process for new members to the  database is now slightly different. It will now be by email done by us, rather than by automated website software.

We will be sorting out any glitches and problems that develop as quickly as we can. Please tell us if you encounter problems as we can’t sort them out if we don’t know about them!

Normal BUS news updates should resume at the end of this week.  Watch-out for the email and make sure you have both our email addresses birdshot@live.co.uk and birdshot@uveitis.net, saved in your address book to be sure to receive the update.

ANNIE AND REA

 

Please  tell us what you think by commenting below.

Dexamethasone for Ocular Inflammation

A new trial, conducted by the Department of Ophthalmology at the University of Illinois has just reported on the efficacy of Dexamethasone (known as Ozurdex) and concludes that ‘The newly approved dexamethasone implant, Ozurdex, is a useful addition to our local armamentarium in the treatment of noninfectious intermediate and posterior uveitis given its efficacy, safety, and ease of use in the outpatient’.

It also concludes that, on the available information, ‘The single injection, 26-week data indicate that the implant is well tolerated and produces meaningful improvements in intraocular inflammation and visual acuity that persist through 6 months. The available 6-month data also indicate that this implant confers much less of a risk of ocular hypertension than other forms of intraocular steroid therapy. However, future longer-term trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety data in patients who receive multiple injections.

We know that some of you are already on Dexamethasone (Ozurdex), and this sounds like good news for others who are not responding to oral immunosuppressants and steroids. Dexamethasone has received FDA approval in the US (FDA is the equivalent of our NICE – the National Clinical Institute of Excellence) so we should be able to get hold of it in exceptional circumstances.

Is anybody on Dexamethasone? Or Retisert (the article seems to conclude that Dexamethasone may be more effective, with less side effects than Retisert)? Anybody want to comment on this?

The full article can be found at: http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.1517/14656566.2011.571209

Rea

Atypical Birdshot?

Anyone out there with symptoms that don’t seem typical for Birdshot?

How many people are affected in just one eye? Many consultants believe that Birdshot is bilateral (i.e. it affects BOTH eyes) and would not diagnose Birdshot if it affects just one eye – do we think this is true? If it is not Birdshot, then what is it?

How many people have pain in their eyes? Birdshot is thought to be painless. I know that I have very painful eyes, particular if I move them (shooting pain deep in the eye), and I know of at least two others who say the same. Anyone else?

How many people have been diagnosed with Birdshot but do not test positive for HLA A29? Again, some consultants would refuse to diagnose Birdshot if there is no HLA A29 positive test. What do we think?

How many people have strange visual symptoms which baffle their consultants? For example, I seem to have images left on my retina for a long time. I will put my keys down, and then I see my keys on a range of other surfaces as I look around, making it very difficult for me to find my keys again! I also have illusions – I will be walking down the street, and I will see a very large cow walking towards me – impossible, I know. What I think is happening is that there is a large shadow, and my brain tries to make sense of this by accessing its filing cabinet to find something of that shape and size, and interprets it as a cow!

How many people have found that their brain seems to have slowed down when trying to see? For example, I will look at my emails, and although I can ’see’ them, I cannot actually read them – the mass of information in a long list just does not compute in my brain – its seems like gobbledegook – although if I look at individual words, I can make them out – I just can’t make sense of the totality of it.

Any other strange symptoms people have? Or things that seem atypical of Birdshot?

We are trying to understand the complexities of Birdshot, so it would be really good to hear all your stories. That way, we may be able to understand whether people have been possibly misdiagnosed, or whether Birdshot presents quite differently in different individuals, or whether there are a range of other problems that masquerade as Birdshot.

As always, we want to thank you for your interest in Birdshot and this website – we have had a huge influx of new members recently and each new member brings more knowledge and understanding of Birdshot. Thank you all, and we would be grateful for your feed-back on atypical (or typical) signs of Birdshot.

Rea

London Marathon – Ken’s amazing feat

Just to let you know that Ken Fitzmaurice (who was running for UIG and BUS via Fight for Sight and raising money for Dr John Curnow and Professor Phil Murray who are researching the causes of uveitis) completed the course in under 4 hours (he did flag a little at the 30 km mark – he blames the heat!).

So far, he has raised just over £1,200 and our target is £2,500, so we really want to keep raising money. With this in mind, Ken has decided to run the Dublin marathon in November – so please, please dig deep and donate to this amazing cause, which may find a cure for all of us! For those of you who have donated, thank you so much.
Rea

Make sure your GP and your consultant communicate!

At BUS, we hear a lot of stories about the difficulties patients with Birdshot have in getting the right medication prescription from their GP.  Many of us with Birdshot have complicated medication regimes – the doses tend to change if we are in flare up or remission, and the actual type of medication may change quite frequently, if we are not responding to our current medication regimes. The other issue we face is that many of the medications we use come in branded and generic forms. So, for example, for those of us on cellcept, this now comes generically and many of us are now using a different brand, (for example Myfenax,) rather than Cellcept, although they are both mycophenolate mofetil. A GP may be keen to issue us with the generic form of our medication, as it is often cheaper and often just as effective. However for some types of immunosuppressants, the generic form is different and has a different effect. Your consultant and possibly your pharmacist will know this, but your GP may well not know.

Communications between the consultant and the GP is never very speedy and often we are faced with having to tell our GP ourselves that the medication regime has changed. This leaves the GP in a difficult position, as the medication regimes are quite toxic, often expensive and the GP is not an expert on immunosuppressants, although should have much more knowledge on steroids. But, do remember that the GP takes responsibility for not over-medicating us and for giving us the appropriate medication; and when we get a prescription from the GP, our medication costs (for those of us using NHS medications) come out of the GPs budget (or the budget of your local Primary Care Trust), and not the hospital. It is really, really important to make sure that you get your consultant and GP to communicate well to avoid any difficulties. One way of doing this is asking your consultant to give you a formal note that you can take to your GP which specifically states any changes in medication, the dosages and whether they need to be branded or the generic forms will do. Another way is by making sure you see the same GP each time and build a relationship with him or her.   And, of course, it is really important that we understand the medication regimes ourselves and the implications of them, so we can help guide our GP.

Just to illustrate how difficult it can be, we are sharing with you a couple of stories from our members (if anybody else has similar stories or stories about their difficulties, do let us know):

Real Ale’s story:

“Having had Neoral (Ciclosporine) added to his Cellcept, because of a flare up after his cataract operation, Real Ale went to his GP for a repeat prescription of the drug. In his efforts to save money the GP prescribed the generic form of Ciclosporine, not realising that could cause a problem. Fortunately the friendly, sharp eyed pharmacist rang Real Ale and queried whether it should be the generic form, pointing out that Ciclosporine was one of those rare drugs that once you have started with a particular brand, you should always continue with the same brand, unless you are deliberately switched. This meant that Real Ale had to go back to the Hospital pharmacy to confirm this was indeed correct. Different brands of ciclosporin have different rates of absorption of the active ingredient which is one reason for taking the drug at specific times. Real Ale’s pharmacist told him to put this advice in writing to his GP and requested a copy was sent to the pharmacy for future reference.

The second story concerns another patient with a similar issue about lack of communications. This time the dose of ciclosporin was being reduced but the GP was not informed and continued to prescribe the wrong strength. Ciclosporin capsules are not something you can break in half to take so this meant a trip back to the hospital to collect the repeat prescription as the GP refused to prescribe it, in the absence of notification from the consultant.

These stories highlight how difficult it can be to have a rare disease that fluctuates and is treated with toxic and expensive medication that is often outside of the experience of the GP. Hence the need to keep the GP properly informed, and to help guide the GP. We are also copying an article below about the pressure placed on GPs to the costs of medications they prescribe (hence the need for us to keep our GPs informed about our rare disease, its fluctuating nature and our need for different medication regimes at different times):

‘GPs are being banned from prescribing high-cost drugs approved by NICE as NHS managers seek drastic savings on prescribing budgets’.

This story was in this week’s Pulse (the professional journal for GPS). It’s about the cuts that certain PCTs are making by creating a banned drugs list to save money. It includes enteric coated prednisolone. What is really important to remember is that we have a RARE DISEASE which SHOULD fall outside of the scope of NICE (NICE is the National Institute of Clinical Excellence and decides on what medications can be used on the NHS) – for those of us with rare diseases, we SHOULD get more flexibility than the NICE guidelines – yet another reason for ensuring your consultant communicates well with your GP and that you build up very, very strong relationships with your GP, your consultant and your pharmacist. Do let us know if any of you are having problems – the more evidence we have, the more able we are to approach the ‘authorities’ such as NICE and the organisation that deals with rare diseases – AGNSS (the Advisory Group for National Specialised Services).

Rea and Annie

 

Update on Birdshot Uveitis Society.

Since the launch of the Birdshot Uveitis Society website just over a year ago, we are now in touch with over 250 people with Birdshot from across the world with nearly 100 of these people living in the UK and signed up and registered with BUS.

In addition we have people registered from as far away as away as USA, Canada, Honolulu, Fiji, Israel, New Zealand, Australia,  South Africa as well as several European countries. 25 healthcare professionals are also signed up (NOTE this does not include all of the medical people involved with the Birdshot Day). These professionals with an interest in Birdshot range from consultants, researchers, registrars, doctors, nurses, medical students, pharmacists and other allied professionals.

We believe that BUS is making strides towards our objectives, having managed to identify a significant group of people who have the condition. We believe that we are in a position to be able to provide a good cohort of patients for researchers interested in doing research into this sight threatening disease.

Annie and Rea

Important please read

Dear Members

We believe that there was a problem with our weekly newsletter last week. It would seem to have got caught up in new spam filters before it ever reached you.  Obviously we are not sure how widespread this problem was, but we thought we should email you to let you know about the potential issue.

We are told that if you add this email address to your address book, it may help prevent this from happening.  If that does not work and you still do not get the news updates,  and so that you do not miss out on any important news, you can always subscribe to the site via the RSS feed button that you find in the top right hand corner of screen.  Simply save the feed to your internet  favourites bar, as described in our post last week, and then check it from time to time to see what is new on the site.

Also please note that if you do not wish to receive our weekly update news from us, you have the option of signing into the website and unsubscribing from the news letter when you are logged in.

Yours

REA AND ANNIE

Short survey for all people with Birdshot

We would also like to gather more information about people who have birdshot and have a short questionnaire that we would like you to download, fill in and send back to us.

These questionnaires will be analysed and they will be written up for potential funding bodies such as the National Institute of Health Care Research.

Please be assured that this information will be held in strictest confidence and individual information will not be released to anyone. (aggregated, general information, will be used to further the cause of Birdshot).

BIRDSHOT QUESTIONNAIRE MARCH 2011 (word document)

BIRDSHOT QUESTIONNAIRE MARCH 2011 (pdf document)

Annie and Rea

Pilot study to explore motion perception

We wrote an introductory piece about this earlier this month and are delighted to now be able to include a short description  written by Nacima Kisma  a researcher at Moorfields who is helping consultant Mark Westcott with the study.  It helps to explain what they hope to achieve from it.

The monitoring of birdshot chorioretinopathy (BCR) cannot be done on a clinical basis only. Clinical signs are usually not immediately detectable when the disease does progress. We therefore need ancillary testing to help us with adjusting and reducing the systemic treatment as quickly as possible.

Electrodiagnosis testing (EDT) is of good value for the monitoring of the disease but does take a long time to perform and is not easy to schedule. Moreover, it can be uncomfortable because of corneal contact lenses, electrodes and flashing lights use.

Visual field testing is much easier to schedule and less uncomfortable than the EDT. The Moorfields Motion Displacement Test (MDT) is a kind of visual field test performed on a laptop. There are 32 lines displayed on a grey background. The lines do move randomly. The patient has to fixate a central spot and to click on the computer mouse when he sees a line moving.

Because it is easy to understand, quick to do (less than 2 minutes) and possible to display on a laptop, we hope that it would be of better use than the other field tests for the monitoring of the disease.

We have decided to look for abnormalities of motion perception in 20 birdshot patients from Moorfields uveitis clinics as a preliminary study. The pilot study is nearing completion and was open to Moorfields patients only.

If this study confirms motion perception losses in BCR, then we postulate that measurement of motion perception losses may be useful in monitoring the disease.

Good outcome from steroid implants

An American study was published earlier this year, looking at the outcomes for Birdshot patients who had been on steroid implants (the longer name for these steroid implants is corticosteroid intraocular devices). 22 Birdshot patients were involved in the study which looked retrospectively (over a 3 year period) at the outcomes.

The outcomes were extremely positive, and showed that the steroid implants had significantly improved vision, controlled inflammation and in the majority of cases stopped the need for other medications. As always, there are some down sides – in the case of steroid implants the main side effects were a high incidence of the progression of cataracts and a high incidence of intraocular pressure (called glaucoma).

If you want to read the full study, go to the American Journal of Ophthalmology.

We at BUS, are really excited that there seems to be a growing number of suitable alternatives for people who are not responding well to oral steroids and various different types of immunosuppressants, or who cannot tolerate these medication regimes.

The importance of a published study is that it provides evidence for patients and consultants who might be struggling to acquire steroid implants from their primary care trusts or health organisation, or who are looking for alternatives to oral steroids and immunosuppression.

For those of you who attended the Birdshot Day in September 2010, you will remember that steroid implants were discussed at some length on the Day. There was one attendee who had these implants and was extremely passionate about them.

If you want to hear more about steroid implants for the Birdshot Day, please go to our clip on retisert implants at:

Since the Birdshot Day, we have heard from one attendee who says that the Day changes her life and equipped her with enough information to be confident in moving to steroid implants. She reports that she can now see clearly for the first time for many years without the aid of immunosuppressive treatment. We also know of another person who has been offered them on a special trial and a third person who is discussing this option with their specialist.

We are so pleased at the more rapid progress of alternative treatments and we are delighted that the Birdshot Day has equipped attendees with the means to work in partnership with their consultants to explore all possible options. We are even more delighted to see that so many more consultants are now listening to their patients and there is a two way dialogue and a real exploration of all options available. Let’s hope that we can also make some headway in finding out the reason we get Birdshot in the first place!